AI and Automation Terms
Draft only. Requires legal review before publication. This software provides compliance tooling, but does not provide legal advice.
AI and Automation Terms
Purpose
Set expectations for AI-generated content, model providers, human review, and automation limits.
Source model
This slot follows mature SaaS and security-software legal-center patterns: Zapier-style customer terms, DPA, subprocessors, security, and data-transfer material; Avast-style license, acceptable-use, privacy, IP, transparency, and accessibility material.
Jurisdiction focus
Prepare this for EU users and Czech-market operation. Complete operator details, Czech consumer wording, cookie consent behavior, GDPR roles, and cross-border transfer safeguards before publication.
AI outputs
AI output may be inaccurate, incomplete, outdated, or unsuitable. Customers must review all outputs before relying on or publishing them.
Human review
Customers are responsible for legal, brand, factual, platform-policy, consent, and professional review before publication or use.
Provider processing
Customer prompts, inputs, and selected workspace data may be sent to configured AI providers. Link providers in the Subprocessor List and privacy materials.
No prohibited decisions
Do not use BAAM AI as the sole basis for high-impact decisions about individuals, including legal rights, employment, credit, health, insurance, housing, education, or access to essential services.
Automation guardrails
Direct publishing, scheduling, webhooks, and integrations must follow official API permissions, customer approval settings, and provider rate limits.
Customer configuration
Customers control connected providers, prompts, brand rules, approvals, publishing choices, and imported data.
Completion checklist
- Confirm enabled AI providers.
- Add EU AI Act review notes if feature scope changes.
- Align with AUP and Terms of Service.
